Text: Gen 45:1-15; Ps 133; Rom 11:1-2a, 29-32; Mat 15:21-28

In recent weeks, several people have expressed anxiety and confusion—even anger at times—over the current state of the Anglican Church, both here in Brandon and world-wide. I expect Bishop Jim to have much to tell us in coming months about what he learned of the state of the Anglican Communion during his time at the Lambeth Conference.

As an observer from the sidelines (i.e. the Internet), what I can say about Lambeth is quite limited.

1.       Contrary to calls earlier in the past year for the Archbishop of Canterbury to cancel it, Lambeth happened. Even so, a sizable group of bishops, most notably from Africa, declined to attend.

2.       Unlike the previous several Lambeth Conferences, this one produced no resolutions, but its final statement referred to “wide agreements” on certain matters.

Regarded as one of the four “instruments of unity” of the Anglican Communion, the Lambeth Conference has been held at the ABC’s invitation every ten years for well over a century. Traditionally, every active bishop in the Anglican Communion has been invited. The invitation list this time left off two controversial bishops—V. Gene Robinson, bishop of New Hampshire, whose ordination to the episcopate touched off the current crisis; and Martyn Minns, ordained as a bishop for the Church of Nigeria to serve its American mission. Every Canadian bishop was invited, and only two did not attend, both for reasons of health.

In late June, many of the bishops who had declined Lambeth invitations met in Jerusalem at a meeting known as GAFCON (Global Anglican Futures Conference.) Their final message suggested that this group of churches see themselves as the future of worldwide Anglicanism. What this says to me is that the Anglican Communion as we have understood it has been changed dramatically—perhaps permanently. Time will tell about that.

These developments have already left their mark on Brandon, with the founding of a church aligned with the GAFCON group. It pains many people within our church and beyond to see Anglicanism fractured in this way. It pains me.

All of our readings today speak to the situation in which our church finds itself.

We heard last week of how Joseph’s jealous older brothers conspired to be rid of him, stopping just short of murder. This week we jump to the climactic end of the Joseph story, as Joseph reveals himself to his family. They quite reasonably expect him to be as vengeful as they were, and are dumbfounded when Joseph instead seeks reconciliation and reunion. The psalm that followed sang the praises of people living together in unity—like oil running down the beard of Aaron, a sign of the unity of the people before God’s high priest; and like the dew of Hermon, a metaphor for God’s abundant blessings. Community unity is not a straitjacket of conformity, but visible shalom—giving and invigorating life.

We can look around the world today and see many of the results of the desire for vengeance—ongoing divisions in various societies, wars, insurrections, and hatred. The seeds of such strife were often planted centuries ago, as in the Caucasus and Afghanistan, to name two current hot spots. None of this works for the good of humanity, for whom God desires only good

God desires for us the blessings of unity, the peace which only God can bring. Shalom!

It is sad to say, but one of the great causes of human strife has always been religious disagreement, particularly when one group or another is sure that they and only they have the only road to God. The readings from the New Testament converge on this issue, notably the divide between Jews and Gentile Christians.

In the central chapters of the Letter to the Romans (9–11), Paul wrestles with the question of the fate of the Jews. He is absolutely convinced of the truth of the Gospel he preaches—Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah so long expected by the Jews—and agonizes over the rejection of Jesus by most of the Jews of his time. What is to become of them? Are they damned for all time? Two weeks ago we heard him raise the question; last week we got a snippet of his argument. This week we get his answer, which for some people is almost no answer at all.

Paul has to believe that God’s promises will be kept—the promise made to Abraham, and passed down through his family, including Joseph. God’s Chosen People will not be “un-chosen.” Paul concludes that in some mysterious way God will redeem the people of Israel. The chapter ends with an outpouring of praise for the depth of the riches of God, whose ways and wisdom and beyond the grasp of any human being.

God desires for us the blessings of unity, the peace which only God can bring. Shalom!

Almost exactly the same issue presents itself in the Gospel, one of the rare occasions when Jesus deals with a non-Jew. Questions about the law abound in the Gospel of Matthew, and we hear Jesus repeatedly re-interpreting the law for his disciples. Here, a foreigner re-interprets the law to Jesus—not the letter of the Law of Moses, but the higher law which he himself pointed to: love, mercy and compassion are the very essence of God’s demands on us.

Jesus sounds harsher here than anywhere else, in effect calling the woman a “dog,” but her quick-witted rejoinder turns him around, and leads him to reach out across the boundaries of religious and cultural divisions. She claims her right to his compassion, and he relents. Barriers come down and disunity turns to peace.

What is the future of the Anglican Church, both world wide and in Brandon? I do not know, but I do know this:

God desires for us the blessings of unity, the peace which only God can bring. Shalom!